Funpec-RpAbout The JournalEditorial BoardCurrent IssueAll IssuesSearchIndexersInstructions For AuthorsContactSponsorsLinks

Localization of HSP single-copy genes by inexpensive, permanent non-fluorescent in situ hybridization on meiotic chromosomes of the grasshopper Schistocerca pallens (Acrididae)

T.T. Rieger, S.V. Oliveira-Silva, I.A. Pachêco, B.S. Chagas and J.F. Santos
Laboratório de Genética Animal, Departamento de Genética (CCB),
Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, PE, Brasil
Corresponding author: T.T. Rieger
E-mail: [email protected]

Genet. Mol. Res. 6 (3): 643-649 (2007)
Received May 10, 2007
Accepted August 13, 2007
Published September 30, 2007

ABSTRACT. There have been many studies on Schistocerca gregaria and Locusta migratoria, which are important grasshopper pests in many parts of the world. However, the main pest grasshopper species in Brazil, S. pallens, Rhammatocerus schistocercoides and Stiphra robusta, are very poorly characterized genetically. We adapted a permanent in situ hybridization method to extend the genetic characterization of S. pallens by mapping the single-copy genes Hsp70, Hsp83, Hsp27, and Ubi on meiotic chromosomes. Hsp70 was mapped on the L2 chromosome, in which 82% of the signals were observed. Hsp83 was mapped on a medium-sized chromosome, on which 81% of the signals were observed, tentatively identified as M7. The hybridization signals for the Hsp27 gene were detected on the L1 chromosome at a frequency of 58%. The main hybridization site of the Ubi probe was on the L2 chromosome, with 73% of the signals. All mapped genes also presented secondary hybridization signals, always at frequencies below 30%. These are the first single-copy genes mapped for S. pallens and also for the Acrididae family. Since the Acrididae generally present very similar karyotypes, these data are useful as new landmarks for chromosome identification and as a tool for phylogenetic studies on the genus Schistocerca and for comparison with other insects.

Key words: Schistocerca pallens, In situ hybridization, Hsp, Single-copy genes, gene mapping, Acrididae

INTRODUCTION

The main species of pest grasshoppers found in swarms that damage crops, native vegetation and pastures around the world are Locusta or Schistocerca species. Swarm formation is a gradual process, along one or two decades, when environmental conditions favor population growth (Steedman, 1990). In polyphenic species, phase polymorphism is triggered by hormonal factors in the growing populations, promoting behavioral changes that cause solitary individuals to become gregarious, through mechanical, visual and chemical-contact stimuli (Hägele and Simpson, 2000; Tawfik and Sehnal, 2003). In Brazil, the main grasshopper species with potential for swarm formation and occasional attacks on cultivated areas are the Acrididae species, Rhammatocerus schistocercoides and Schistocerca pallens, and the Proscopiidae species Stiphra robusta. Although genetic approaches are important for knowledge of physiological and etiological features needed for efficient biological control planning, as has been demonstrated for L. migratoria and S. gregaria (Simonet et al., 2002a,b), there have been only a few genetic studies of Brazilian pest grasshopper species. Genetic knowledge on these species is limited to chromosome number, which in the Acrididae is typically 2n = 23 (XO, males) and 2n = 24 (XX, females). The karyotype is composed of chromosomes similar both in size and shape, which makes correct identification of each chromosome difficult. The use of banding patterns facilitates this task in S. pallens and S. flavolineata (Souza and Melo, 2007), although new markers are still needed. The best-characterized species in the genus Schistocerca is S. gregaria, from which several genes have been cloned, including abd-A (Tear et al., 1990) and abd-B (Kelsh et al., 1993), the HOX homeotic cluster (Ferrier and Akam, 1996), FABP (Wu et al., 2001), two neuroparsin genes (Janssen et al., 2001), five chemoreceptor genes (Angeli et al., 1999; Picone et al., 2001), and genes coding for two isoforms of the serine-protease pacifastins (Vanden Broeck et al., 1998; Simonet et al., 2002a). The genome size of grasshoppers, such as S. gregaria, is about 9.3 gigabases, about 52 times the genome of Drosophila melanogaster, which severely limits the use of a whole-genome-sequencing approach (Hoy, 1994), and even cloning of single genes has rarely been done. In situ gene mapping can generate markers to detect chromosomal rearrangements that occur during the evolutionary process, when compared to other species (Campos et al., 2007). We examined the localizations of the single-copy genes Hsp70, Hsp83, Hsp27, and Ubi by permanent in situ hybridization (PISH) on the meiotic chromosomes of the grasshopper S. pallens. This is an important first step towards genetic characterization, generating physical markers that can individualize the chromosomes, which would also be useful as landmarks to guide a future genome-sequencing program for this species.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Specimens and cytological preparations

Testes from eight adult males of S. pallens collected from the states of Pernambuco and Bahia in the northeast region of Brazil (Table 1) were dissected, fixed in ethanol and acetic acid (3:1) and stored in a freezer. Slides were prepared by the squash technique, with a testicular follicle in 45% acetic acid (Souza, 1991). After freezing in liquid nitrogen to remove the cover slip, the preparations were stored at 4ºC until hybridization. The best preparations were used for PISH.

Plasmid amplification and probe preparations

The probes were prepared from conserved sequences of D. melanogaster genes Hsp70 (Livak et al., 1978), Hsp83 (Holmgren et al., 1981), Hsp27 (Corces et al., 1980), and Ubi (Izquierdo et al., 1994), all cloned in pBR322-derived plasmids. Plasmids were transformed in the DH5 α strain of Escherichia coli with the lithium acetate method and extracted by alkaline lysis (Sambrook et al., 1989). Whole plasmids were biotin labeled by nick translation using the BioNick DNA system, as indicated by the manufacturer (Gibco/BRL, Paisley, Scotland), to be used as probes.

In situ hybridization procedures

Hybridizations were carried out at 37ºC in 30% formamide for 40 h, using 100 ng biotin-labeled probe for each slide. Stringent washes were made at room temperature with 2X SSC. The BluGene non-radioactive detection system (Gibco/BRL) was used for detection of the hybridization sites. After hybridization, the chromosome preparations were counterstained with lactic orcein (1% orcein in 20% lactic acid and 45% acetic acid) diluted 1:10 in 45% acetic acid, air dried and mounted in Entellan (Merck). The PISH signals in the chromosomes were analyzed and documented under phase-contrast microscopy. Since heterologous probes were used, we decided to quantify the signals, as described previously by Campos et al. (2007), and established a minimum of 30% signals at a site as a criterion of consistent marking.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

In the grasshopper, Schistocerca pallens, as in other representatives of the Cyrtacanthacridinae subfamily, the karyotype is composed of acro-telocentric chromosomes divided into three size groups: large (L1, L2 and L3), medium (M4 to M8 and X chromosome), small pairs (S9, S10 and S11), and the sex determination system is XX, XO (Mesa et al., 1982). The medium and small chromosomes are especially difficult to distinguish. Although conventional cytogenetic markers, such as nucleolus organizer region and C-banding patterns, are very important for chromosomal individualization (Souza and Melo, 2007), they do not cover all chromosomes in the karyotype. Consequently, additional genetic markers can be very useful. The localization of single-copy genes can be of special interest to compare the karyotypes of close species or genera. While this can be accomplished by fluorescent in situ hybridization, the useful time for analysis is limited before signals disappear, and the cost of reagents and necessary equipment can be restrictive. To overcome these difficulties, we adapted a non-fluorescent and non-radioactive PISH procedure for meiotic chromosomes of the grasshopper S. pallens. The low cost and permanent marking makes it useful to generate signals on condensed meiotic and mitotic chromosomes.

Using biotinylated heterologous probes from D. melanogaster, the Hsp70, Hsp83, Hsp27, and Ubi loci were mapped by PISH on meiotic chromosomes of the grasshopper S. pallens. More than 750 nuclei after hybridization of probes of the four genes were analyzed, reaching a mean of marked nuclei of 60%, assuring that the technique was efficient. Since we used heterologous probes from a distant species, the hybridization signals were quantified and presented as frequencies. We established arbitrarily that 30% is the minimum frequency for a mark to be considered consistent, which makes the results still more reliable.

In each case, the probe hybridized mainly at a single site, with signal frequency always above the minimum of 30%, in different autosomal pairs (Table 2). The signal of the Hsp70 gene probe hybridization was detected in 64% of the 313 nuclei analyzed, where 82% of the marks were on the L2 chromosome (Figure 1). This is an indication that the Hsp70 gene should be in single copy in S. pallens, as in D. virilis (Evgen’ev et al., 2004) and in the willistoni species group of Drosophila (Bonorino et al., 1993), although it is duplicated in several species of the melanogaster and obscura species groups (Segarra et al., 1996).


Figure 1. Localization of Hsp genes (arrows) on meiotic chromosomes of Schistocerca pallens. A. Pachytene with the Hsp83 mark on the M7 chromosome. B. Pachytene with Hsp70 on the L2 chromosome. C. Diplotene with the Hsp27 mark on the L1 chromosome. D. Metaphase with the Ubi gene mark on the L2 chromosome. Bar = 10 µm.

The Hsp83 gene probe hybridization signal was found in 77% of the 211 nuclei analyzed, with 81% of the marks on a medium-size chromosome, identified hereafter as the M7 chromosome (Figure 1). The uniqueness of the Hsp83 gene in S. pallens is consistent with the fact that in all insects investigated so far this gene is single-copy (Konstantopoulou and Scouras, 1998; Landais et al., 2001). For both Hsp70 and Hsp83, other minor signals were also found that did not reach the minimal frequency of 30% to be considered as consistent marks.

The hybridization signals for the Hsp27 gene probe were detected in 60% of the 78 nuclei analyzed, the main signal was observed on the L1 chromosome (Figure 1) at a frequency of 58%, although another mark could be found on the M4 chromosome at a frequency of 34%, which is just above the limit to be considered as a second consistent mark. It will be of interest to determine if this second mark represents a bona fide duplication of the Hsp27 gene in S. pallens.

The probe for the Ubi gene hybridized mainly on the L2 chromosome (Figure 1), at a frequency of 73%. This should be the polyubiquitin locus in S. pallens, and the minor signals putatively represent ubiquitin-fusion genes. Although marked at a frequency of 17% which is below the minimum of 30%, it is possible that a site on the L1 chromosome represents another polyubiquitin locus. Some strains of D. melanogaster present a polyubiquitin gene on the X chromosome, in addition to the main locus on chromosomal arm 3R (Izquierdo, 1994).

This PISH method can easily be applied to condensed meiotic and mitotic chromosomes of insects and other organisms, generating genetic markers additional to those of conventional cytogenetic techniques. The chromosomal landmarks established in this study will be useful as physical markers to guide an eventual genome-sequencing program for S. pallens. This can extend the possibilities of comparing the gene content of similar karyotypes of several species, probably expanding evolutionary knowledge concerning species for which whole-genome sequencing is still a prohibitive cost choice.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors thank Dr. Maria José de Souza for comments on an early version of this manuscript and Dr. Rita de Cassia Stocco dos Santos for suggestions. Research supported by a CNPq grant and fellowship (DCR program) to T.T. Rieger. S.V. Oliveira-Silva was the recipient of a CNPq Master’s degree fellowship, and I.A. Pachêco and B.S. Chagas were recipients of PIBIC/UFPE-CNPq fellowships.

REFERENCES

Angeli S, Ceron F, Scaloni A, Monti M, et al. (1999). Purification, structural characterization, cloning and immunocytochemical localization of chemoreception proteins from Schistocerca gregaria. Eur. J. Biochem. 262: 745-754.

Bonorino CB, Pereira M, Alonso CEV, Valente VLS, et al. (1993). In situ mapping of the Hsp70 locus in seven species of the willistoni group of Drosophila. Rev. Bras. Genet. 16: 561-571.

Campos SR, Rieger TT and Santos JF (2007). Homology of polytene elements between Drosophila and Zaprionus determined by in situ hybridization in Zaprionus indianus. Genet. Mol. Res. 6: 162-176.

Corces V, Holmgren R, Freund R, Morimoto R, et al. (1980). Four heat shock proteins of Drosophila melanogaster coded within a 12-kilobase region in chromosome subdivision 67B. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 77: 5390-5393.

Evgen’ev MB, Zatsepina OG, Garbuz D, Lerman DN, et al. (2004). Evolution and arrangement of the hsp70 gene cluster in two closely related species of the virilis group of Drosophila. Chromosoma 113: 223-232.

Ferrier DE and Akam M (1996). Organization of the Hox gene cluster in the grasshopper, Schistocerca gregaria. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93: 13024-13029.

Hägele BF and Simpson SJ (2000). The influence of mechanical, visual and contact chemical stimulation on the behavioural phase state of solitarious desert locusts (Schistocerca gregaria). J. Insect Physiol. 46: 1295-1301.

Holmgren R, Corces V, Morimoto R, Blackman R, et al. (1981). Sequence homologies in the 5’ regions of four Drosophila heat-shock genes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 78: 3775-3778.

Hoy MA (1994). Insect molecular genetics: an introduction to principles and applications. Academic Press Inc., New York.

Izquierdo M (1994). Ubiquitin genes and ubiquitin protein location in polytene chromosomes of Drosophila. Chromosoma 103: 193-197.

Izquierdo M, Arribas C, Galcerán J and Cabrera VM (1994). Characterization of a Drosophila repeat mapping at the early-ecdysone puff 63F and present in many eucaryotic genomes. Biochem. Biophys. Acta 783: 114-121.

Janssen T, Claeys I, Simonet G, De Loof A, et al. (2001). cDNA cloning and transcript distribution of two different neuroparsin precursors in the desert locust, Schistocerca gregaria. Insect Mol. Biol. 10: 183-189.

Kelsh R, Dawson I and Akam M (1993). An analysis of abdominal-B expression in the locust Schistocerca gregaria. Development 117: 293-305.

Konstantopoulou I and Scouras ZG (1998). The heat-shock gene hsp83 of Drosophila auraria: genomic organization, nucleotide sequence, and long antiparallel coupled ORFs (LAC ORFs). J. Mol. Evol. 46: 334-343.

Landais I, Pommet J, Mita K, Nohata J, et al. (2001). Characterization of the cDNA encoding the 90 kDa heat-shock protein in the Lepidoptera Bombyx mori and Spodoptera frugiperda. Gene 271: 223-231.

Livak KJ, Freund R, Schweber M, Wensink PC, et al. (1978). Sequence organization and transcription at two heat shock loci in Drosophila. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 75: 5613-5617.

Mesa A, Ferreira A and Carbonell CS (1982). Cariologia de los acridoideos neotropicales: estado actual de su conocimiento y nuevas contribuciones. Ann. Soc. Entomol. Fr. 18: 507-526.

Picone D, Crescenzi O, Angeli S, Marchese S, et al. (2001). Bacterial expression and conformational analysis of a chemosensory protein from Schistocerca gregaria. Eur. J. Biochem. 268: 4794-4801.

Sambrook J, Fritsch EF and Maniats T (1989). Molecular cloning: laboratory manual. 2nd edn. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New York.

Segarra C, Ribó G and Aguadé M (1996). Differentiation of Muller’s chromosomal elements D and E in the obscura group of Drosophila. Genetics 144: 139-146.

Simonet G, Claeys I, November T, Wataleb S, et al. (2002a). Cloning of two cDNAs encoding isoforms of a pacifastin-related precursor polypeptide in the desert locust, Schistocerca gregaria: analysis of stage- and tissue-dependent expression. Insect Mol. Biol. 11: 353-360.

Simonet G, Claeys I, Vanderperren H, November T, et al. (2002b). cDNA cloning of two different serine protease inhibitor precursors in the migratory locust, Locusta migratoria. Insect Mol. Biol. 11: 249-256.

Souza MJ (1991). Two simple methods for the preparation of mitotic and meiotic chromosomes of Orthoptera. Braz. J. Genet. 14: 1079-1084.

Souza MJ and Melo NF (2007). Chromosome study in Schistocerca (Orthoptera-Acrididae-Cyrtacanthacridinae): karyotypes and distribution patterns of constitutive heterochromatin and nucleolus organizer regions (NORs). Genet. Mol. Biol. 30: 54-59.

Steedman A (1990). Locust handbook. 3rd edn. Natural Resources Institute, Chatham.

Tawfik AI and Sehnal F (2003). A role for ecdysteroids in the phase polymorphism of the desert locust. Physiol. Entomol. 28: 19-24.

Tear G, Akam M and Martinez-Arias A (1990). Isolation of an abdominal-A gene from the locust Schistocerca gregaria and its expression during early embryogenesis. Development 110: 915-925.

Vanden Broeck J, Chiou SJ, Schoofs L, Hamdaoui A, et al. (1998). Cloning of two cDNAs encoding three small serine protease inhibiting peptides from the desert locust Schistocerca gregaria and analysis of tissue-dependent and stage-dependent expression. Eur. J. Biochem. 254: 90-95.

Wu Q, Andolfatto P and Haunerland NH (2001). Cloning and sequence of the gene encoding the muscle fatty acid binding protein from the desert locust, Schistocerca gregaria. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 31: 553-562.

   Copyright © 2007 by FUNPEC-RP