|
Short Communication
Microsporogenesis in inbred line of popcorn
(Zea mays L.)
G.C.L. Ricci1, N. Silva1, M.S. Pagliarini1and
C.A. Scapim2
1Departamento de Biologia Celular
e Genética,
Universidade Estadual de Maringá, Maringá, PR, Brasil
2Departamento de Agronomia, Universidade Estadual de Maringá,
Maringá, PR, Brasil
Corresponding author: M.S. Pagliarini
E-mail: mspagliarini@uem.br
Genet. Mol. Res. 6 (4): 1013-1018 (2007)
Received May 9, 2007
Accepted September 25, 2007
Published November 27, 2007
ABSTRACT.
Endogamy places genes for several characteristics in homozygosis, which include
those related to meiosis causing abnormalities that may impair gamete viability.
An original population (S0) of popcorn (CMS-43) produced by Embrapa
Maize and Sorghum was self-pollinated for seven years, generating inbred lines
(S1 to S7). Conventional studies of microsporogenesis revealed
that meiotic abnormalities did not increase with endogamy. Univalent chromosomes,
irregular chromosome segregation, abnormal cell shape, partial asynapsis,
cell fusion, absence of cytokinesis, abnormal spindle orientation, and chromosome
stickiness were recorded in low frequency in meiocytes. Since the frequency
of abnormalities was low, mainly in S7, inbred lines from CMS-43
have a high potential for hybridization.
Key words:
Endogamy, Inbred lines, Microsporogenesis, Popcorn, Combining ability
INTRODUCTION
The most important breeding objective is
to improve yield (Trifunovic et al., 2003), and only lines that possess high
breeding value for yield and other traits of interest that have an impact
on yield warrant recycling in breeding programs. The main objective of maize
breeding programs is to develop new inbred lines with high-combining ability
to produce higher grain yields and superior agronomic performance in hybrid
combinations. In such breeding programs, the choice of parents is crucial,
because it will determine the genetic constitution of the source population,
which, in turn, determines the probability of selecting a new superior line
(Hallauer and Miranda Filho, 1988).
Meiosis is an event of high evolutionary
stability that culminates in the reduction of chromosome number in gametes.
Cytological events of meiosis are controlled by a large number of genes acting
from pre-meiosis to the post-meiotic mitoses (Baker et al., 1976; Golubovskaya,
1979, 1989). Mutations of these genes may cause anomalies that impair plant
fertility (Albertsen and Phillips, 1981; Curtis and Doyle, 1991). When an
allogamous plant is submitted to self-pollination, many genes, including those
involved in the control of meiosis, experience homozygosis causing inbreeding
depression. Irregularities in microsporogenesis due to inbreeding have been
reported in several plant species (Lamm, 1936; Myers and Hill, 1943; Morris
and Isikan, 1964; Pantulu and Manga, 1972; Karp and Jones, 1982; Defani-Scoarize
et al., 1995, 1996; Pagliarini et al., 2002).
The cytological stability of maize inbred
lines is an important consideration in view of their extensive use in genetics
and plant breeding research (Morris and Isikan, 1964). In alfalfa (Smith and
Murphy, 1986) and maize (Morris and Isikan, 1964; Lima et al., 1984; Hallauer
and Miranda Filho, 1988; Pagliarini, 1989), seed production was shown to be
severely depressed by endogamy. However, little is known about factors directly
responsible for this depression. Thus, this study was systematically planned
to investigate the effect of endogamy on the meiotic behavior in one population
of popcorn and to deduce the possibilities of using the S7 inbred
lines in crosses, taking into account their meiotic stability as one of the
selected characters.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
A commercial population of popcorn (S0),
called CMS-43, produced by Embrapa Maize and Sorghum Research Center (CNPMS
- Sete Lagoas, MG, Brazil), in 1979, was chosen to determine the effects of
endogamy on microsporogenesis. This population was selected in the popcorn
germplasm collection of CNPMS due to its resistance to Puccinia sp
and to Helminthosporium turcicum. It originated
from crosses among 33 genotypes of white grains (Pacheco et al., 1992). The
original population was self-pollinated yearly until the seventh generation
(S0-S7) on the Experimental Farm of State University
of Maringá (Maringá, Paraná State, Brazil).
For cytological analysis, seeds from S0
to S7 generations were cultivated simultaneously in the summer
of 2004 in a randomized complete block design with three replications. Three
plants per replication were analyzed per generation. Young inflorescences
for meiotic studies were collected in the morning and fixed in 3:1 ethyl alcohol:acetic
acid for 24 h and then transferred to 70% alcohol and stored under refrigeration
until use. Meiocytes were prepared by squashing and staining with 1%
propionic carmine.
More than 550 meiocytes per plant were analyzed
in each generation involving cells from pachytene to tetrad stage. All types
of meiotic abnormalities were considered. Photomicrographs were made with
a Wild Leitz microscope using Kodak Imagelink - HQ, ISO 25 black and white
film.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
From S0 to S7, 72 plants
were evaluated with respect to their meiotic behavior. Different types of
meiotic abnormalities were recorded in low frequency in each generation (Table
1). The most common meiotic abnormalities were those related to irregular
chromosome segregation (Figure 1a to g) observed in all generation. Precocious
chromosome migration to the poles in metaphases (Figure 1d,e) and laggard
chromosomes in anaphases led to micronucleus formation in telophases (Figure
1b,c) and microcytes in the tetrads (Figure 1g), or polyads (Figure 1f). These
abnormalities are caused by univalent chromosomes that occur in diplotene/diakinesis
(Figure 1a). Univalents appear in these phases as a result of the absence
of chiasmata in some bivalents. Chiasmata are mechanically important to ensure
bipolar alignment and regular segregation of homologs during the first (reductional)
meiotic division. Chiasma formation is a character under polygenic control
(Rees and Thompson, 1956; Lein and Lelley, 1987). Selfing of allogamous plants
leads to gene segregation, so that a different chiasma frequency may appear
among lines of the same origin and, as a consequence, different frequencies
of univalent chromosomes can occur. The frequency of univalents varied during
the selfing cycle; S3 and S4 generations were the most
affected. Univalent chromosomes, in general, show precocious migration to
the poles, leading to micronucleus formation in telophase. Irregular chromosome
segregation in both meiotic divisions has been determined to be the main cause
of unbalanced gamete formation (Gottschalk and Kaul, 1974; Koduru and Rao,
1981; Pagliarini, 2000). Studies performed in different plant species have
shown a negative correlation between univalent chromosomes and fertility (Moraes-Fernandes,
1982; Smith and Murphy, 1986; Pagliarini, 1989, 2000). Negative correlation
between univalent chromosomes and combining ability has been recorded in inbred
lines of maize (Pagliarini, 1989).


Figure 1. Different
types of meiotic abnormalities observed in CMS-43 and its endogamous lines.
a) Meiocyte in diakinesis showing eight bivalents and two pairs of univalent
chromosomes (arrows). b) Early telophases I with one micronucleus. c) Telophase
I with several micronuclei. d, e) Metaphases II with precocious chromosome
migration and micronuclei in e. f) Pentad of microspores. g) Tetrad
with two microcytes. h, i) Anaphase II (h) and telophase II (i) with absence
of first cytokinesis and sequential spindle orientation. j) Telophase II with
a restitution nucleus. k, l) Meiocytes with abnormal cell shapes.
Other types of meiotic abnormalities were
recorded from S0 to S7, including partial asynapsis,
cell fusion, absence of cytokinesis (Figure 1h and i), abnormal spindle orientation
in the second division (Figure 1h and i) leading to restitutional nucleus
formation (Figure 1j), abnormal cell shape (Figure 1k and l), and chromosome
stickiness. All abnormalities observed in CMS-43 have been reported among
inbred maize lines previously analyzed (Pagliarini, 1989; Defani-Scoarize
et al., 1995, 1996; Caetano-Pereira and Pagliarini, 1996; Caetano-Pereira
et al., 1998; Utsunomiya et al., 2002; Pagliarini et al., 2002). Several lines
of evidence obtained for different plant species have demonstrated that each
step of meiosis is genetically controlled (Gottschalck and Kaul, 1974; Baker
et al., 1976; Koduru and Rao, 1981; Golubovskaya, 1979, 1989). Allogamous
species, such as popcorn, have a degree of heterozygosis that ensures normal
meiosis. When this system is broken by inbreeding, some abnormalities may
become frequent. The frequency of cells with meiotic abnormalities was very
low in the present study, suggesting that CMS-43 is a population with a high
frequency of dominant homozygous loci for meiosis control.
Meiotic mutations do not affect vegetative
development and do not change the plant phenotype. They can be revealed only
during tassel inflorescence and, as a rule, meiotic mutants display complete
or partial male and/or female sterility (Golubovskaya, 1989). Although the
present lines were not yet tested for combining ability, the meiotic stability
ensures that the S7 lines may have a high
potential for the production of new popcorn hybrids.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
research supported by PRONEX/FUNDAÇÃO
ARAUCÁRIA - No. 1227-33/04.
REFERENCES
Albertsen MC and Phillips RL (1981). Developmental cytology
of 13 genetic male sterile loci in maize. Can. J. Genet. Cytol. 23:
195-208.
Baker BS, Carpenter AT, Esposito MS, Esposito RE, et al. (1976).
The genetic control of meiosis. Annu. Rev. Genet. 10: 53-134.
Caetano-Pereira CM and Pagliarini MS (1996). Unusual shapes
of maize microsporocytes. Nucleus 39: 107-110.
Caetano-Pereira CM, Defani-Scoarize MA, Pagliarini MS and
Brasil EM (1998). Syncytes, abnormal cytokinesis and spindle irregularities
in maize microsporogenesis. Maydica 43: 235-242.
Curtis CA and Doyle GG (1991). Double meiotic mutants of maize:
implications for the genetic regulation of meiosis. J. Hered. 82:
156-163.
Defani-Scoarize MA, Pagliarini MS and Aguiar CG (1995). Causes
of partial male sterility in an inbred maize line. Cytologia 60:
311-318.
Defani-Scoarize MA, Pagliarini MS and Aguiar CG (1996). Meiotic
behavior of inbred lines of maize (Zea mays L.). Nucleus
39: 10-18.
Golubovskaya IN (1979). Genetic control of meiosis. Int.
Rev. Cytol. 58: 247-290.
Golubovskaya IN (1989). Meiosis in maize: mei genes
and conception of genetic control of meiosis. Adv. Genet. 26: 149-192.
Gottschalk W and Kaul MLR (1974). The genetic control of microsporogenesis
in higher plants. Nucleus 17: 133-166.
Hallauer AR and Miranda Filho JB (1988). Quantitative genetics
in maize breeding. State University Press, Ames.
Karp A and Jones RN (1982). Cytogenetics of Lolium perenne.
I. Chiasma frequency variation in inbred lines. Theor. Appl. Genet.
62: 177-183.
Koduru PK and Rao MK (1981). Cytogenetics of synaptic mutants
and fertility interrelationships in prairie Bromus inermis Leyss
populations. Cytologia 37: 747-757.
Lamm R (1936). Cytological studies on inbred rye. Hereditas
22: 217-240.
Lein V and Lelley T (1987). A separate control for frequency
and within-bivalent distribution of chiasmata in rye (Secale cereale
L.). Genome 29: 419-424.
Lima M, Miranda Filho JB and Gallo PB (1984). Inbreeding depression
in Brazilian populations of maize (Zea mays L.). Maydica
29: 203-215.
Moraes-Fernandes MIB (1982). Estudo da instabilidade meiótica
em cultivares de trigo. Efeito genotípico, relação com
fertilidade e seleção de plantas estáveis. Pesqui.
Agropecu. Bras. 17: 1177-1191.
Morris R and Isikan MH (1964). Cytological studies on inbred
lines of maize. Can. J. Genet. Cytol. 6: 508-515.
Myers WM and Hill HD (1943). Increased meiotic irregularity
accompanying inbreeding in Dactylis glomerata L. Genetics
28: 383-397.
Pacheco CAP, Gama EEG, Lopes MA and Santos MX (1992). Formação
de compostos de milho-pipoca. Relatório Técnico Anual do Centro
de Pesquisa de Milho e Sorgo: 1988/1991, Sete Lagoas.
Pagliarini MS (1989). Avaliação da freqüência
de quiasmas em milho (Zea mays L.) e suas implicações
com a capacidade de combinação para a produção
de grãos. PhD thesis, Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de
Queiroz/USP, Piracicaba.
Pagliarini MS (2000). Meiotic behavior of economically important
plant species: the relationship between fertility and male sterility. Genet.
Mol. Biol. 23: 997-1002.
Pagliarini MS, Defani MA, Walter FM and Pereira JE (2002).
Recurrence of meiotic abnormalities in maize genotypes from the same origin
and their influence on productivity. Crop Breed. Appl. Biotechnol.
2: 355-360.
Pantulu JV and Manga V (1972). Cytology of inbreds and F1
hybrids of pearl millet. Theor. Appl. Genet. 42: 69-74.
Rees H and Thompson JB (1956). Genotypic control of chromosome
behavior in rye. III. Chiasma frequency in homozygotes and heterozygotes.
Heredity 10: 409-424.
Smith S and Murphy RP (1986). Relationships between inbreeding,
meiotic irregularity and fertility in alfalfa. Can. J. Genet. Cytol.
28: 130-137.
Trifunovic S, Córdova H, Crossa J and Pandey S (2003).
Head-to-head and stability analysis of maize (Zea mays L.) inbred
lines. Maydica 48: 263-269.
Utsunomiya KS, Bione NCP and Pagliarini MS (2002). How many
different kinds of meiotic abnormalities could be found in a unique endogamous
maize plant? Cytologia 67: 169-176.
|